Stalking Celebrities Essay -- essays research papers

The Stalking of Celebrities Stalking remains Hollywoods recurrent celebrity nightm are.1 neer before have we been able to know as much wetly a star as we do ab emerge a close pal. Thanks to publications and TV shows that cater to the public appetite for celebrity news, theres shortsighted privacy for stars. We learn the minor details of their go throughs--from an early schooling, to first kiss, depart divorce, drug problems, hopes and fears.2 Celebrities on their own property are not sound from high-powered lenses, I will discuss what celebrity shuck is, wherefore we should have harsher laws against walk, and what the difference is amongst photojournalism and the paparazzi. I will prove that stalking celebrities just because there rich or famous is wrong. The law defines stalking as placing a person in fear of his or her safety, veritable(a) without intent to carry out the threat.4 Being famous increasingly marrow living in fearSeventeen percent of the stalkers victims are celebrities.6 Stalking of celebrities is not through by your average autograph hound.7 The stalking behavior due to delusional disorders affects 3 out of each 10,000 people and only 1%-2% of wholly mental patients, Dietz says. But it is increasing as our culture promotes celebrities as the theology of the day.8 The knowing of the habits and secrets of celebrities has become a national obsession, says James Swanson, a lawyer and author.9 There is roughly a dozen types of stalkers. Obsessive bash motivates most celebrity stalkers, followed by erotomania--a person believing that he or she is loved by someone famous. Cant celebrities just put in a security system, hire a few body guards, have their cull out mail checked and relax?10 Its not that simple. Theres a constituent of terrorism involved in stalking that is life-altering, Lane says. Once you live in fear, you lose trust in people and become more(prenominal) isolated. It hangs with you for the rest of your life. Thats a very high price to pay for fame.11 Where stalking is concerned, society, it seems, inadequacys to keep it a personal matter. Perhaps due to the largely domestic context of the crime, most people rely on the out of sight, out of mind approach where stalking episodes are concerned. Cases are viewed as lovers quarrels or personal matters, and other people (often including law enforcement officials) choose to felon a blind eye--usually until it is too late to he... ...pers and magazines. This requires lying, bribing, and getting the photograph by any means necessary.22 A photojournalists is journalism in which news stories are presented mainly through photographs. This requires getting assignments from reporters, listening to scanners, and going to games or entreat conferences. They are there to summarize events and emotions through the lens .23 Its a flock of money when one considers that hundreds of photojournalists struggle to find jobs that average around $20,000 a year. M aybe a little more money could keep the argue more focused on what is news?24 Not every news event is pleasant. There are times when people dont want to be photographed. Fires, car accidents, shootings--they are not pleasant, but they are news. I have discussed what celebrity stalking is, why we should have harsher laws against stalking, and what the difference is between photojournalism and the paparazzi. I have proven that stalking celebrities just because of their riches or fame is wrong. If you support my thesis you will go to http//www.soshelp.org/ and expand your knowledge near stalking. Celebrities lives are like a diary open to the public, supplied by the press.