Napster Essays -- essays research papers

Napster The Debate Over Copy objurgate InfringementIn early 1999, Shawn Fanning, a Northeastern University freshman, created Napster softw ar. That summer he made it operable for free through his Napster.com website. Napster is a peer-to-peer technology, which makes it possible for exploiters to freely share their unison files through the internet with other users all over the world. Specifically, this is how Napster works1.)A user sends a request for a shout.2.)Napster checks its database of medicine to see if the song is on the PC hard-drive of another Napster user whose computer is turned on (Note No music is stored onNapster servers).3.)Napster finds the song.4.)Napster sends the song in MP3 format to the user who requestedOn December 6, 1999 the record industry sued Napster in federal official rule Court for copyright infringements, and petitioned that court to shut down Napster. On July 26, 2000 the judge issued a temporary injunction to shut down Napster, and the abutting day Napster appealed the ruling before the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The following day the Appeals Court granted Napster temporary reprieve against injunction so they could advertize review the injunction request. On October 2, 2000 the opposing parties presented their supporting arguments before the Court. The slickness was finally resolved on February 12, 2001 when a ruling by the District Court of Appeals upheld the original ruling that Napster was aware its users were swapping copyrighted materials. Subsequently, Napster was ordered to come apart allowing its millions of users to swap copyrighted material without a topple. There are some(prenominal) ethical issues involved in this case. First is the theft of the copyrighted music produced by artists who have not given Napster the right to transmit their music. Secondly, is the right of Napster to provide a legitimate service to consumers, and how that right has been attacked by artists in the recording industr y. There are, indeed, two sides to this story.The stakeh sr.s involved in this case are the artists, the recording industry as a whole, retailers, and consumers. All of these stakeholders are abnormal equally in this matter. The artists, recording industry, and music retailers face substantial deviation of income if c... ...g they need to do, considering the investment in the company.Perhaps the optimal solution for Napsters dilemma is the possibility of a cable TV type succumbment. Users earnings a certain monthly fee for all the downloaded music they wanted. They could tittle-tattle with their favorite artists, get first claim on concert tickets, and shop at possible downloads by genre. The new system would pay the artists their royalties and sell millions of older titles that at present are sitting in vaults because no stores volition give them shelf space. This option has the advantages of cooperation between the music industry and Napster. Napster users lead have the s ame type of service as they do now, with extras so they wont have to turn to no-fee options (Gnutella and Freenet). Music companies will be able to use the Internet for sales of all their merchandise. If music companies mass package a better experience people will pay for it. In a recent survey of college students more than two thirds of the respondents would be willing to pay for a $20 dollar monthly fee of a similar service. The only foreseeable disadvantage of this solution is the plausibility of the record companies cooperating in such an effort.